![]() When you do git rebase, as we discussed it already, git moves your local changes to a temporary area and then one by one git adds those changes on top of your branch. But before I show you this solution, I want you to understand why you cannot push. This is a common situation and there is a simple solution for that. Probably you had already code on the remote repository before doing git rebase. Git rebase -skip I cannot push to the remote repository after git rebase We would like to rebase my-branch to last changes which are on the develop branch. How to use git rebase? Simple git rebase scenario - no conflictsīelow, I show you an example, how you can do git rebase. This is illustrated below:Ī-B-C-D branch 'master' (refers to commit 'D') This means that it isn’t referring to a named branch, but only to some specific commit. In this case, you will say that your HEAD is in detached state. ![]() It is possible to move this HEAD marker to a specific commit. So, when you pull all changes from the remote repository, you can say that you are on top of the HEAD. If on the remote repository are changes, that you don’t have them locally, you can say that you are behind the remote HEAD. You can think about it as a marker, which tells you where you are now. HEAD is a reference to the last change in the current branch. We often say that rebase moves your local changes on top of the HEAD. Then one by one it will move each of your local changes on top of the downloaded changes. But when you use rebase, git moves your local changes to a temporary area and pull all changes from the remote repository to your branch. After you resolve them and commit, the merge commit will be generated. ![]() In case there will be some conflicts, you will see them as one list. It will put all changes together in date-time order. When you use git merge, git will try to resolve conflicts at once. Let’s compare git merge and git rebase with more details. Of course, if all of your team members will use this git rebase approach. The same will be for the rest of your team. This approach will allow you to have all of your commits as one common piece. If you are interested in order commits by logical steps, I recommend you to use git rebase command. These commits are automatically generated during the merging process. The other thing is that you can see commits with the title “Merged in…”. You can see that even you have some connected commits, after the merge, it looks like one big mess. In this case, git tree can look like this: It’s very hard to reproduce the way of thinking or the implementation steps for a specific feature. After combining all changes, one of your commits is on top of the git tree and one somewhere in a middle. In the meantime, your team did other tasks. Everything is working, so you decide to merge those changes with the master branch. In the second commit, you add communication with the backend. Imagine that you need to implement login functionality. In some cases it’s a good solution, but not here. But, what you could notice too, is that the changes are in a very strange order. Your branch is merged with the main branch. This will allow you to combine your changes with the main branch. Normally, when you start working with branches, you will just use git merge command. This is the third article in the git series, so if you want to know more about basics of git usage, go to my previous articles. This is very useful especially when you work in a team. It will allow you to have a better structure and order of your commits. Today, I have a very nice git feature for you. This is normal that you do small steps and discover new features on the way. When you are starting your adventure with git, it’s hard to know everything from the beginning.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |